01
Find
Gather evidence from every place it landed.
Evaluation exports, faculty email, informal notes, and coordinator tracking all begin as separate sources.
Skip to contentSource preserved
Feedback-to-CCC infrastructure
From everyday feedbackto a CCC-ready packet.
ResiReview captures feedback while it is fresh, organizes it against your specialty milestone framework, builds longitudinal evidence, and prepares the packet—so program leadership can focus on judgment, coaching, and decisions.
Specialty-aware evidence mappingLeadership-reviewable packetsHuman judgment stays in control
Capture. Feedback enters when the moment is fresh.
Structure. Evidence is mapped to the program framework.
Prepare. The packet arrives organized for leadership review.
The hidden work before CCC
CCC prep should not begin with inbox archaeology.
The evidence exists—but it lives across delayed forms, email threads, spreadsheets, memory, and isolated comments. Program leadership spends the week before CCC reconstructing a story the feedback workflow should have been building all along.
The problem is not one missing report.
It is the repeated manual work of finding, interpreting, labeling, reconciling, and repackaging evidence for every learner and every review cycle.
Scattered feedback
Comments are split across forms, email, and informal notes.
Manual interpretation
Someone must connect each observation to the relevant specialty framework.
Packet reconstruction
The learner story is rebuilt again before every review cycle.
The feedback-to-CCC workflow
The packet builds as training happens.
Instead of asking program leadership to reconstruct months of evidence, ResiReview carries each feedback moment forward through one structured workflow.
01 · Capture
Collect the feedback already happening.
Requested and direct feedback enters one structured workflow while the clinical context is still fresh.
02 · Map
Connect observations to the specialty framework.
ResiReview organizes evidence against the program’s configured specialty milestones while preserving the original feedback.
03 · Build
Create a longitudinal learner record.
Repeated observations become an organized view of strengths, growth areas, follow-through, and evidence gaps over time.
04 · Prepare
Assemble the CCC-ready packet.
The packet is drafted with mapped evidence, selected excerpts, trends, growth plans, and areas that still need leadership review.
Specialty milestone mapping
Stop translating every comment by hand.
ResiReview preserves the original observation, extracts the behavior and next step, and organizes the evidence against the specialty milestone framework configured for your program.
Source feedback remains visible beside the mapping
Evidence can contribute to more than one relevant area
Program leadership can review and correct the structure
No final milestone judgment is assigned by the marketing workflow
Evidence mapping workbench
Program-configured specialty framework
Original feedback
“Jordan prepared a thoughtful operative plan and adapted well when the anatomy differed from imaging. Before the next case, make the contingency plan explicit during the briefing.”
Evidence components
Observed behaviorClinical contextActionable next step
Structured evidence
ReviewablePatient care
Operative planning and adaptation
Prepared plan; adapted to unexpected anatomy.
Strong source match
Medical knowledge
Clinical decision rationale
Linked intraoperative findings to a revised approach.
Supporting evidence
Communication
Team briefing
Next step: state contingency plan before incision.
Growth target
CCC-ready packet preparation
Packet assembly becomes review, not reconstruction.
By the time the committee cycle begins, the learner’s evidence is already organized: source-linked feedback, mapped milestone areas, longitudinal themes, prior goals, follow-through, and gaps that deserve discussion.
CCC packet draft
Jordan Lee · PGY-3
Evidence through October 15 · Leadership review required
Export previewReview packet
Evidence by specialty area
Source-linked longitudinal view
Operative planning
5 evidence itemsClinical decision-making
4 evidence itemsTeam communication
3 evidence itemsLongitudinal narrative
Multiple reviewers describe progressive improvement in operative planning after a documented growth intervention. Communication feedback is favorable, but evidence is concentrated in the operating room and should be sampled in additional settings.
Packet readiness
Feedback sourcesComplete
Milestone organizationComplete
Growth-plan follow-upIncluded
Leadership reviewRequired
Evidence gap
Limited recent feedback on handoffs outside the operating room. Consider targeted sampling before final review.
Committee boundary
The packet structures evidence. The CCC interprets it and makes the final progression decision.
Longitudinal by default
See development across time and settings.
A repeated pattern is easier to distinguish from one isolated comment when the timeline is already assembled.
Growth-plan continuity
Connect the next attempt to the prior goal.
The packet can show whether a learner received a next step and whether later feedback documents follow-through.
Evidence gaps
Know what is missing before the meeting.
Sparse or inconsistent sampling can be surfaced for leadership attention instead of hidden by a polished summary.
Program leadership leverage
Take the administrative work out of educational judgment.
The strongest program workflow does not automate the committee. It removes the repetitive preparation work that prevents coordinators, directors, and CCC members from spending their time on the learner.
Program coordinator
Less chasing. Less packet assembly.
Track open requests, roster status, evidence coverage, and packet readiness without rebuilding the story from email, spreadsheets, and exported forms.
Program director and APD
A clearer view of progression.
Review longitudinal evidence in context, see where feedback is consistent or incomplete, and arrive at learner conversations better prepared.
CCC members
Evidence organized before the meeting.
Move from document retrieval to clinical interpretation with packet sections already structured for review—not final decisions made by software.
One operating model
Capture once. Use throughout the learner journey.
Clinical moment
Growth plan
Mentor review
CCC packet
Prepared evidence. Human decisions.
Automate the assembly work—not faculty judgment.
ResiReview should make the evidence easier to see and use. It should not convert a complex clinical-education decision into a black-box score.
ResiReview prepares
The preparation layer
Feedback capture and source organization
Proposed specialty milestone evidence mapping
Longitudinal themes and growth-plan continuity
Packet sections, excerpts, and evidence gaps
Completion and readiness signals
Program leadership owns
The decision layer
Clinical and educational context
Interpretation of conflicting evidence
Final milestone and progression judgments
Coaching, remediation, and support plans
Committee decisions and official documentation
A focused layer, not a forced migration
Keep your system of record. Add the feedback-to-CCC layer.
Broad GME platforms manage formal program operations. ResiReview is designed to improve the upstream workflow: capturing useful feedback, structuring evidence, supporting growth, and preparing the review packet.
Existing GME system
Administrative system of record
Formal evaluations
Duty hours
Scheduling
Procedure logs
Accreditation workflows
Institutional reporting
ResiReview
Feedback and CCC preparation layer
CaptureFast requested and direct feedback
MapProgram-configured specialty evidence
DevelopLongitudinal growth and follow-through
PrepareCCC-ready packet drafting
Program questions
Clear boundaries before a pilot conversation.
The value proposition is operationally ambitious, but it should remain precise about system fit, human review, evidence visibility, and the current private-beta posture.
Does ResiReview replace our current GME platform?
No. ResiReview is designed as a focused feedback-to-CCC workflow layer. Your current platform can remain the system of record for formal evaluations, scheduling, duty hours, procedure logs, and institutional reporting.
How does specialty milestone mapping work?
Feedback is organized against the specialty framework configured for the program. The source language remains available beside the structured evidence so program leadership can review context rather than relying on an unexplained label.
Does AI assign final milestone levels or make CCC decisions?
No. ResiReview can assist with organizing evidence, identifying relevant domains, and preparing packet drafts. Program leadership and the CCC retain responsibility for interpretation, milestone judgments, remediation decisions, and final documentation.
What can be included in a CCC-ready packet?
The workflow can organize mapped feedback evidence, selected excerpts, longitudinal themes, growth-plan follow-through, evidence gaps, and supporting review material according to the program’s configuration and role permissions.
Can the program see every private coaching comment?
Visibility should follow role, consent, and threshold rules. The program-facing experience is designed to support oversight and organized evidence without turning resident development into indiscriminate surveillance.
What is the current security and compliance posture?
The supplied strategy describes a controlled private-beta posture with explicit no-PHI operating rules. It does not establish completed HIPAA, BAA, or production-compliance readiness, so those claims should wait for legal, security, and institutional validation.
Private program pilots
Walk into the next CCC with the evidence already organized.
Start with one residency program, one cohort or review cycle, and one measurable question: can a feedback-first workflow reduce the work of preparing useful learner evidence?
Best suited for a program with a coordinator champion and program director, APD, or CCC sponsor.