01
Ask for the feedback you need.
Request coaching on the exact moment that matters: preparation, presentation, decision-making, communication, or ownership.
Skip to content
RequestCaptureRefineGrowRole-aware Learner controlled
Feedback-first GME · Built by residents
Training moves fast.Feedback should keep up.
ResiReview turns everyday teaching moments into timely, human-reviewed coaching, private growth plans, and organized evidence for program review—without forcing clinical teams through another long form.
Controlled private betaDesigned for no-PHI useHuman approval before send
The product begins with a resident need—not an administrative form: “What should I do differently next time?”
The feedback gap
The teaching moment is now.The evaluation arrives later.
Residents improve through specific observations tied to real work. But the context is often lost to delayed forms, vague comments, and review cycles that happen after the learner could have used the coaching.
Feedback that arrives after the rotation is a record. Feedback that arrives before the next case is coaching.
For residents, by residents
Built from inside residency, not around it.
ResiReview is designed for the reality that residents learn while moving: between cases, after consults, during handoffs, on rounds, and through the peers who see their work every day.
02
Residents can coach residents.
Peer feedback captures the work residents see most clearly—teamwork, readiness, teaching, follow-through, and growth between shifts.
03
Sub-interns enter the same feedback culture.
Focused requests and rotation feedback give students clearer expectations, useful coaching, and a reflection-ready record of growth.
One continuous feedback loop
From clinical moment to a usable next step.
01 · Request
Name the moment before it disappears.
A resident asks for feedback on a specific skill while the clinical context is still fresh.
ResiReview
Resident feedback workspace
Targeted request
Ask a question someone can actually answer.
Clinical moment
Operating room
Rounds
Consult
Presentation
Focus area
PreparationOperative planDecision-making
02 · Capture
Respond without opening another long form.
A faculty member, fellow, or resident types or dictates a quick observation between clinical responsibilities.
ResiReview
Resident feedback workspace
Quick capture
Preserve the observation while the context is fresh.
Voice or text note
Educational feedback only
“Strong understanding of the indication and anatomy. Next time, have the first three steps ready and name the decision point that would change the plan...”
PHI reminder acknowledged
03 · Refine
Use AI to improve the draft—not replace judgment.
ResiReview helps turn rough notes into specific, behavior-based coaching. The reviewer edits and approves every message.
ResiReview
Resident feedback workspace
Human-reviewed AI
Better wording. Same human judgment.
Quick note
“Good prep. Needed a clearer plan.”
Draft to review
You demonstrated a strong understanding of the indication and relevant anatomy. Before the next case, prepare a concise sequence of the first three steps and identify the decision points that would change your approach.
Edit draftApprove and send
04 · Grow
Convert one comment into a next step.
The learner can organize feedback into a private growth plan and carry selected evidence into a rotation or review packet.
ResiReview
Resident feedback workspace
Learner action
Make the next attempt different.
Growth plan
Operative preparation
1Outline the first three operative steps
2Name two decision points before the case
3Reflect after the next OR day
Organized context
Patient CareMedical KnowledgeSystems-Based PracticePractice-Based Learning
Selected feedback can later support a learner-controlled rotation packet or program review workflow.
More paths to useful coaching
Feedback should not depend on catching one person at the right time.
Residents often see the preparation, teamwork, ownership, and teaching that formal evaluators miss. ResiReview opens a direct path for resident-to-resident coaching while keeping faculty, fellows, and sub-interns inside the same coherent feedback system.
Targeted requestsPeer coachingSub-intern feedbackPrivate receiptAnonymous safeguards
Feedback network
Coaching can move with the team
From
Resident
To · Resident
Teamwork after call
Specific observation + next step
From
Senior resident
To · Sub-intern
Oral presentation
Ownership, structure, readiness
From
Faculty
To · Resident
Operative preparation
Human-reviewed AI-assisted draft
Psychological safety needs product rules.
Privacy defaults, appropriate anonymity options, membership approval, and aggregate thresholds help create more ways to speak without turning feedback into an unrestricted public review.
AI with a clear boundary
AI improves the draft. The reviewer owns the message.
The most useful feedback is specific, behavior-based, and actionable. ResiReview helps reviewers get there faster while preserving their voice, context, and final authority.
Rough observation
“Good job today. Be more prepared next time.”
The intent may be valid. The learner still does not know what to repeat, what to change, or what “prepared” means.
Draft for human review
Not sentYou communicated clearly during rounds and kept the team organized. Before tomorrow, prepare a one-line assessment and plan for each patient so your recommendations are more concise and actionable.
Strength namedBehavior identifiedNext step defined
EditReview complete · Send
Private growth workspace
One thread of development
Feedback
Operative preparation
Specific observation received
Growth action
Prepare first three steps
Added to private plan
Reflection
Review after next case
Compare the next attempt
Rotation packet
Selected evidence, organized with intent.
Strengths
Growth areas
Selected feedback excerpts
Reflection
Next steps
Feedback becomes development
A comment should not disappear into an inbox.
Residents can turn feedback into private next steps, revisit those goals during the next clinical attempt, and select what belongs in a polished rotation or mentor-ready packet.
ACGME-style organization, without claiming endorsement.
Feedback can be organized into strengths, opportunities, next steps, and familiar competency domains so the learner and program can work from clearer evidence.
Resident-centered. Program-ready.
A better feedback culture, without turning training into surveillance.
Program leaders need evidence that feedback is happening and learners are progressing. Residents need a space where coaching remains useful, appropriately private, and connected to their own development.
Oversight
What programs can organize
Roster, invitations, and role status
Feedback request and completion signals
Threshold-protected aggregate themes
Learner-selected packets and review exports
Boundaries
What should stay protected
Recipient-private coaching content by default
Small-group detail below privacy thresholds
Unapproved AI-generated language
Clinical information outside no-PHI rules
A focused layer, not a forced migration
Keep the system of record. Fix the system of growth.
Broad GME platforms are built to manage programs. ResiReview begins with the part that still breaks: capturing better feedback in the first place and carrying it forward into learner development.
Your existing GME platform
The administrative system of record
Formal evaluations
Duty hours
Scheduling
Procedure logs
Accreditation workflows
Institutional reporting
ResiReview
The daily feedback and growth layer
RequestResidents ask for focused coaching
RespondReviewers capture observations quickly
RefineAI assists; humans approve
GrowLearners create next steps and packets
Practical questions
Clear answers before a pilot conversation.
ResiReview should earn trust through clarity: what it does, what it does not replace, how AI is bounded, and what still needs validation.
Does ResiReview replace our current GME platform?
No. The initial product is a focused feedback and growth layer. Your existing system can remain the system of record for scheduling, duty hours, evaluations, and other administrative workflows while ResiReview improves the upstream feedback loop.
Does AI write and send feedback automatically?
No. AI assistance is used to help organize and improve a reviewer’s draft. The human reviewer remains in control and reviews the message before it is sent.
Can residents give feedback to one another?
Yes. The product is designed to support direct and requested feedback across appropriate program roles, including resident-to-resident coaching, with privacy and role controls around the workflow.
What can program leaders see?
Program workflows can support rosters, requests, completion signals, aggregate themes, packets, and exports according to role. Recipient-private coaching and small-group information should remain protected by the product’s access and threshold rules.
Is the product HIPAA compliant?
The supplied product strategy does not establish a completed HIPAA, BAA, or production-compliance posture. The current launch direction is a controlled private beta under explicit no-PHI operating rules while legal, security, and compliance readiness are validated.
Private design-partner pilots
Build the feedback culture residents deserve.
Bring residents, faculty, and program leaders into one feedback loop—from the clinical moment to a specific next step and organized review evidence.
Best suited for a residency program with a coordinator champion and program leader sponsor.